Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Banuchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Bill Banuchi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

NN person, no G News hits on him and only one on the institution   C T J F 8 3  chat 04:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, as I have tagged it. I think the SD and AfD had a simultaneous posting. Happens sometimes. BTW, it's also apparently autobiographical/self-promotion. Surprise! - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO, no sources cited. I removed the speedy template, as the Christian Coalition role is at least a claim to notability, albeit a tenuous one.  caknuck °  needs to be running more often  06:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (GregJackP (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as no notability is shown. Aiken   &#9835;  00:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: 23 hits for <"Bill Banuchi"> at Google News archives.  As state head of the Christian Coalition, he does seem to show up repeatedly in press reports giving quotes to oppose gay rights, condoms, etc. in New York.  Here's one with his picture.  "Marriage and Family Savers" leads to a few more hits including some quotes at OneNewsNow.com, the news service of the American Family Association.  I'm probably still leaning to delete, but if something significant turns up in third party media that focuses on him personally, it might justify a keep.--Arxiloxos (talk) 05:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Nearly all of those Google News hits seem to be quoting Banuchi rather than saying anything about him beyond his position. The only one with significant coverage is entitled "Creep of the Week: Rev. Bill Banuchi", so can hardly be used as the basis of a neutral article. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.