Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Blum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Bill Blum

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

nominating for deletion as the subject appears to be non-notable and non-verifibable in accordance with the policies and guidelines of the project. The WP:COI creator and main contributor removed the PROD tag and all the tags for improvement without addressing the issues and according to[| this] has doubts himself whether he is actually sufficiently notable for inclusion Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete - I can't find any significant coverage of the subject. I can find some things he's written, but that doesn't confer notability upon him. Moreover, this page should probably redirect to William Blum the historian. Brilliantine (talk) 11:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  13:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 17:06, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. No information about sales figures, awards and etc. In fact, there arn't even any inter-wiki links to his books. Maybe this means the novels themselves are so non-notable, that no-one has bothered making an article for them?!  A Pro di gy   Sign Here/Contact 18:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.