Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Dauterive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Opposing mass nominations isn't a policy based reason Secret account 23:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Bill Dauterive

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of King of the Hill through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so the coverage in List of characters in King of the Hill is enough detail on the character. TTN (talk) 22:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I oppose template based mass AfD noms on single issues. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Keep Nominator attempting to AfD all King of the Hill character articles based on single issue. Article currently being edited and improved. Mjpresson (talk) 04:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Article has inline citations, valid external links, and notability is clearly established. Mjpresson (talk) 23:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unsourced and non-notable.   Hi DrNick ! 23:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of reliable sources demonstrating any notability, and for a miserable failure of WP:PLOT (the article has a single sentence that says anything with a real world basis, the rest is just the plot arc of the character.) gnfnrf (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.