Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Grummett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Ethically  Yours! 15:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Bill Grummett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-Notable Canadian politician. Rivalnator (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Per WP:POLITICIAN, a person who has sat in a federal, provincial or state legislature is always notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia, with no exceptions. See point #1: members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature. They do not have to meet some subjective or arbitrary threshhold above that which would separate "notable" from "non-notable" members of the same legislature, a condition which would just lead us into a constant parade of circular, unresolvable and potentially partisan (i.e. "delete because I disapprove of their ideology") debates about whether any given legislator was "notable enough" or not; while the actual quality of the article can still be an issue that necessitates improvement of the article in some cases, if they've sat in a legislature then their basic notability is not up for debate. Keep. Bearcat (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. per Bearcat. --SamanthaPuckettIndo (talk) 21:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:POLITICIAN. Members of provincial legislatures are notable. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bearcat. Finnegas (talk) 16:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.