Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Kaulitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. I'll take care of straightening out the redirects mentioned in this discussion. Pigman ☿ 05:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Bill Kaulitz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't state notability. Harland1 t/c 11:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Merge I believe this pages was orginally redirected but has since been reverted against the consensus. Most of the page was previously deleted as fancruft. --Neon white (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: as non-notable. Soxthecat (talk) 20:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not sure if the band's notability passes onto the members, but this is about a living person and has no sources whatsoever. If sources can be found, I'd suggest merging any useful content into the band's main article. Spawn Man Review Me! 11:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I dont think it should be deleted. I come here to look up new stuff going on with Bill. The band is famous enough to have their own member pages! Leave it!19:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Anathema_idol
 * The band may have notability for it's own article but that doesn't gaurantee individual members their own article. Every serticle has to prove notability seperately.--Neon white (talk) 17:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete and re-redirect to Tokio Hotel. The band's notability is undeniable, but there's no evidence Bill (or Tom, Georg, or Gustav, for that matter) has any notability apart from the band. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 15:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Both this article and Tom Kaulitz were redirected to a combined article titled Bill and Tom Kaulitz. After it was decided that this article should be merged with Tokio Hotel. I redirected both this and Tom Kaulitz to avoid a double redirect. The redircet was removed by an anon ip who added unsourced info, it should have been reverted but no-one caught it. Idealy the article should reverted to how it was seen as it has no more notability than then. --Neon white (talk) 17:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Talk:Bill Kaulitz redirects to Talk:Bill and Tom Kaulitz, Bill and Tom Kaulitz redirects to Tokio Hotel - to me, this seems to be misleading and the talk pages should also be taken care of in the course of this deletion debate. BNutzer (talk) 08:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.