Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Lawrence (trademark)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. No opinion on the legal matter, etc. Consensus is that this does not meet notability standards - the end. —Wknight94 (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Bill Lawrence (trademark)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No apparent notability of the trademark or the dispute. All references appear to be primary sources - no indication this was covered by any media. Shell   babelfish 21:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Perhaps there should be an article on the brand of musical instruments denoted by this trademark, which can cover the trademark dispute as well as facts about the instruments themselves and the people and companies that have made them. *Dan T.* (talk) 00:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. This article is the result of a complicated and nasty legal dispute between two people. I'm inclined to think that the best solution would be to delete the articles on both sides of the issue, Bill Lawrence (trademark) and Bill Lawrence (guitar maker). The latter article covers a living person who, while being interesting and important in the guitar world, does not appear to have any substantive claim to notability per current WP standards. (Even Guitar Player magazine only has insignificant references to the topic.) Deleting just one article would be likely to inflame the partisans. ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 17:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Notability not established.  Article seems to exist for the purpose of making a point.  Fails WP:N and WP:POV any rewrite is not likely to address either of these issues.  Vegaswikian (talk) 02:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.