Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill McNutt III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Bill McNutt III

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Could not find sources to show subject meets WP:GNG  Neil N   talk to me  18:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think this person meets WP:POLITICIAN. Don't see the sort of coverage that meets WP:GNG.  Even Texas Commission on the Arts is a red link.--Cube lurker (talk) 18:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I have no idea why this person has an article. Theoldsparkle (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable local politician and businessman; comment - it was probably created as a WP:COATRACK for information about the arrest of this Republican leader on a local college campus "based on SMU's receipt of multiple student complaints against Mr. McNutt alleging behavior that violates University policy, such as offering alcohol to minors"; which his lawyer is now attempting to suppress, including on Wikipedia, based on an alleged court order, despite its clear documentation in newspaper articles, etc. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  19:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't think the idea that SMU has barred this person from their campus is in dispute. The editor who posted about the issues stated: "An individual listed on Wikipedia has obtained a court order erasing the arrest from databases." here.  They also stated that "I have a client and he has a court order removing the arrest info." here, both of which seem to imply that they have an association with the subject, that there is an existing court-ordered legal action and that the arrest for violating SMU's written notice is what they want deleted from WP's 'database'. Shearonink (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


 * No need to turn the AFD into a coatrack either OM.--Cube lurker (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - An appointee to a state-level position is not inherently notable, he is not a politician.
 * note - I think Bill McNutt II is ripe for an AfD as well, a guy who mail-ordered fruitcakes (I'm totally not making this up) is all he has going for him, and the article is largely the same as it was in 2006 when it was sourced to a single LA Times obituary. Tarc (talk) 19:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG, searching online showed nothing that could show notability either. - SudoGhost 19:21, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * delete Fails GNG.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 19:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete & Close per WP:SNOW. Mythpage88 (talk) 22:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.