Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Mutz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Bill Mutz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:NPOL. WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV providing direct and in depth coverage of the subject. There is routine, normal coverage. BLP articles should strictly follow sourcing requirements in guidelines.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Missing WP:POLITICIAN also WP:TOOSOON in all likelihood. -- Roger editor (talk) 09:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked for spamming, likely WP:UPE. MER-C 15:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the sourcing is not enough to justify an article for a local politician. Mayors are not default notable, we need high quality indepth coverage which is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Mayors are not inherently notable, and there doesn't seem to be anything here which gets him over that line. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mayors do not get an "inherent" notability freebie just because they exist — the notability test for mayors is the ability to write and source a substantive article about his political significance (specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects he had on the development of the city, and on and so forth), not just the ability to offer technical verification that he exists. But this article, as written, just documents that he exists and says nothing about him that would actually pass the bar. Bearcat (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.