Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Postmus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Bill Postmus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person; in addition I feel the article's emphasis on the negative raises BLP issues. This person's electoral positions as county assessor and county supervisor are not sufficient for notability per WP:POLITICIAN, and general coverage about him is not sufficient for notability per WP:GNG. Half the article is about allegations of corruption, including a criminal conviction, but that issue got only local and at-the-time coverage - nothing which would justify an article here. MelanieN (talk) 05:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: I agree with nom's rationale. He is a local politician in an area not famous enough for local politicians to inherit notability, and neither his actions as administrator nor his (alleged and convicted) criminal activity achieved significant national coverage. For what it's worth, I disagree that the article has BLP problems - his local coverage is almost entirely about his criminal activity and not about his political record. It's therefore quite appropriate for Wikipedia to cover him in the same way. Ivanvector (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.