Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Sipper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:13, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Bill Sipper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet our standards for notability S Philbrick  (Talk)  16:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

There are some thorny issues not immediately obvious if you look at the current version of the article. They are the subject of the confidential ticket:2020010810007402, although some of the issues are directly and indirectly discussed at User_talk:Sphilbrick

I will openly concede that I see arguments on both sides of the inclusion of this very negative information, and I'm ducking that issue by suggesting that the entire article should be deleted.

While you will note that it currently has no sources, that's a little misleading. If you look at a prior version:

here

You will see that some editor tried to add sources but did so improperly. They were removed in a recent trimming of the fluff.

After the removal of the fluff, even if someone went to the effort of coming up with sources for the claims in the article, this doesn't appear to meet our usual standards of notability.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  16:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Doesn't meet WP:GNG either. A quick google search doesn't provide much to add. Lunar Clock (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this is an unsourced biography of a living person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not close to meeting notability no matter how hard I look and I do try. Collect (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No sourcing and a further search didn't come up with much to establish GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.