Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Vrebosch, Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Bill Vrebosch, Jr.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-chosen political candidate with little coverage (about 4500 hits, split between him and his father) Night of the Big Wind  talk  00:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete This failed political candidate who got about 4% of the vote also fails WP:POLITICIAN.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  03:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Y'know, I've probably got among the most inclusionist perspectives on political biographies as anyone here. But a fourth place finish in a city council race?!?! All I can do is quote Gob Bluth: "WP:COMEON!!!." This one doesn't come remotely close to clearing the high notability bar for failed political candidates which has been established here by consensus. Carrite (talk) 15:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC) Last edit: Carrite (talk) 16:00, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the reasons already given. Bgwhite (talk) 07:34, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable candidate. Atrian (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep notable candidate, is a political insider and community activist. 4th place in a heavy NDP-Liberal ward with a main street view of how the city should operate. User:TimHarper068 (talk) 19:23, 14, August 2011 (UTC)
 * And is he chosen in any institution of importance? Night of the Big Wind  talk  23:45, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.