Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill of Rights for Young Offenders


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Veinor (talk to me) 14:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Bill of Rights for Young Offenders

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is a full-text document of a United Nations proposal, so it fails WP:NOT. I suggest that, if it's historically notabled, it may be transwikied to Wikisource. YechielMan 04:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If legally possible, transwiki to Wikisource. If not, delete in its current incarnation. No stance on new text. -- saberwyn 04:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC) -- saberwyn 21:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki if possible, or convert to prose.  bibliomaniac 1  5  05:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikisource, and post relevant links. Extremely notable in that it made Canada's young offender laws hard to implement. Plus, it's part of UN's Bill of rights. Thus, move to wikisource. George Leung 05:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have given it a big overhaul. What say you now? - Richard Cavell 05:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki the old version to Wikisource, keep the new one as a valid article on a notable subject. MER-C 08:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep new version, transwiki the text of the old. This stub could use expansion, but that will come with time, I'm sure. It would be interesting to know whether it has been used as the basis for reforming juvenile codes anywhere, for instance. Brianyoumans 19:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As a law student, I can confirm that it forms the basis for major reforms to Australian and Canadian law. I'm a bit busy with other articles to take this one on, though. - Richard Cavell 22:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Not really reform but hindering, but I am soapboxing. George Leung 01:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep this article as it covers an important topic. Mr. Berry 07:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant topic. Metamagician3000 08:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.