Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill vicenzino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 21:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Bill vicenzino


Questionable notability, no evidence provided to meet WP:PROF. Contested prod. MER-C 11:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak delete per nom. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 11:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be the lead author of a study that has gotten some press, though this needs to be indicated in the article.  . johnpseudo 16:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Still appears to be below the threshold of notability. (as a phrase) gives zero Google hits. GregorB 22:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep leader of many studies which have been published in journals around the world, re; google hits over 500 hits under vicenzino manipulations, agreed the direct phrase was not found but did outline the large number of studies vicenzino is asociated with — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blondbobby (talk • contribs)
 * Keep, per Johnpseudo. 26 publications listed on GScholar, and seems fairly prominent from his UQ staff bio. Seriously in need of cleanup, though. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 20:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Unenthusiastic Keep. The NYTimes article about his work is enough to establish notability, despite the poor state of the article. Demiurge 21:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.