Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billa 2 - The Chase Continues


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Billa 2 - The Chase Continues

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:CRYSTAL. More than half the information on the article has not yet been officially reported or confirmed from any of the sources provided. The title itself was made by crystal balling. The film has only been merely announced and only the director and lead actor have been reported. No other cast/crew members have been announced yet. This film is highly unlikely to start until 2011, as said in the article and the sources itself. (On a side note, the creator User:Asalajith is a sockpuppeteer who previously used the account User:Brajbilla2007. He was warned many times about WP:NPOV and WP:CRYSTAL.) EelamStyleZ (talk) 15:42, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  17:33, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as recreated version of a deleted article. BUT, as it has different content, it does not quite qualify for a speedy... barely.  However, I invite editors to review Articles for deletion/Billa 2 from March 2009, as the rumoured Vishnuvardhan film had an article even back then that was redirected to Billa (2007 film) to await developments.  As the project is still in developement and its production has a quite shaky history, the recreated article, even under a slightly different name and slightly different content, is still WP:TOOSOON.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:13, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed, but please note: that previous article was also created by the sockpuppet user I mentioned above. He has an extensive history of creating premature articles. Also, I wouldn't say the film is still in development-much too early for that even. To be accurate, the director only hopes to get this movie made. And I used a g4 tag since they were two different pages. EelamStyleZ (talk) 02:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Darn socks. Well... the current redirect still serves, as the plans for filming, unrequited or not, do get coverage. Since this new title is pure speculation, perhaps it should be salted?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, don't see the need for salting for this particular page. I'm sure the creator won't try to create it again once deleted. The actual page with the true title of the film (Billa 2) is better off being salted. EelamStyleZ (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. The reasons are mentioned above, crystal balling, too soon, sock puppet etc. I think, a sequel section at Billa (2007 film) is enough as of now. Johannes003 (talk) 17:50, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. This is pure crystal balling--Sodabottle (talk) 04:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.