Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billboard (record producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Billboard (record producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person, Does not meet WP:GNG. Has been tagged since July 2011 as needing more references. Zpeopleheart (talk) 10:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as News and two web searches found some links but surely nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly fails GNG. Ceosad (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly passes WP:COMPOSER; needs better and more references, which I can find extremely easily on Google when I looked so... Instead of deleting, you could always find these not-so-dificult to find citations. Edit: I added liner note citations to all of them. I don't see a need to cite the record sales of them for passing NALBUMS, you can just find that on the album pages. Since the complaints about this article are no longer existent, I propose the AfD end. SanctuaryXStop talking in codes 02:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * But isn't this about a person instead of his recordings? WP:NOTINHERITED I struggle in finding anything more than brief mentions about him. This WP:MUSICBIO guideline is more relevant: "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." Liner notes help, but they are not independent sources. Ceosad (talk) 14:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I looked a little further and there's actually WP:COMPOSER"Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition." He has several notable compositions in that list.SanctuaryXStop talking in codes 14:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, he seems to be a notable person, and would undoubtedly be notable, but we cannot prove that he is notable. I am worried about depth of coverage that is certainly lacking in any sources I could find. Ceosad (talk) 15:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll see if I can find more references, but you only have to meet a criterion, not all or multiple of them to be considered notable. I had that linking to the wrong page~ Fixed it. Plus, your NOTINHERITED link, doesn't apply because it isn't inherited. You can't inherit something from what you created. That is meant to say that just because a person/thing is notable, not all of their works/associated things are. If a person's works are notable, then that person is notable.WP:COMPOSER.SanctuaryXStop talking in codes 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No comments since last relisting., Let's give it one more try.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 12:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Actually, if they meet any of the criteria of WP:COMPOSER, they may be notable; it doesn't mean they are notable. In this case the lack of significant in-depth coverage doesn't help them pass WP:GNG, and their songwriting credits aren't strong enough on their own.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that the almost complete lack of substantive coverage is a death knell here. The songwriting credits by themselves are insufficient. --Bejnar (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.