Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billie and Bella (1)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Billie and Bella (1)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Nothing to show that this book is notable. No GHits or GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK.  ttonyb (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This story isn't published - says it all really -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:09, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I originally PROD'd the article because it appeared not to meet the notability guidelines -- and that was without the bit about not being published. As per ChrisTheDude, that comment says it all. Jimmy Pitt   talk  11:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unpublished books are by definition not notable. --Quartermaster (talk) 13:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unpublished, non-notable book. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:10, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Some kid is posting his stories on WP. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.