Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Jack Dial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  01:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Billy Jack Dial

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable. Article was created by its subject and speedied. It was then recreated, and then prod'ed, which was removed by another editor. Requests for proof of notability have gone unanswered. Spike Wilbury 23:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt no proof seen. Also, WP:COI, look at the creator. --Whsitchy 23:03, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, The article definitly appears to be WP:COI. The bio part read like a book, with information that I do not belive could be referenced. --  Random  Say it here! 01:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Deletissimo Although it may not have violated copyright, this is spam in my view, as the article was written with the aim of publicising the person on his own website. Trashy vanity piece. This guy has posted a biography on bnainoachnews.com, and wikinoah.org, and has done a C&P here, but nothing to indicate he's all that notable: 33 unique Ghits: all but one hit rubbish, the last one's a trivial; all the external links appear to be trivial mentions of his council memberships, so there would be some difficulty sourcing the totality of his biography in accordance with WP:A. Furthermore, this is part of a walled garden being planted by the subject to further his personal aims, and the organisational goals of United Noachide Council, Inc., an entity whose notability does not appear to be all that solid: 16 unique Ghits. Ohconfucius 02:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Eusebeus 09:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Billy Jack is mentioned in High Council of B'nei Noah as on of the first members. The article is certainbly in need of massive editing, but it would leave readers in more confusion about the B'nei Noah movement if there are no pages about its first council's founding fathers. It is difficult to tell whether this discussion is getting the attention it needs from people who are well-versed in the Noahide siubject matter.Kaz 10:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, any editor should be able to assess whether the article asserts and proves notability per the guidelines in WP:BIO. If the article does not, it should be deleted. --  Spike Wilbury  13:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Y not? 23:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.  -- Y not? 23:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is WP:NN, as well as violation of WP:NOT and WP:NOT. IZAK 05:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, WP:COI and completely lacking context. --Evb-wiki 15:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.