Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Jack Haskins (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Billy Jack Haskins
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is merely a college player that never became a professional player. He does not appear to meet the notability guidelines. Firstclass306 (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes GNG with many articles of significant coverage found at nl.newsbank.com. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Haskins was a starting quarterback for two years (1995 and 1996) for a Power 5/SEC (i.e., top tier) team. He received abundant and significant coverage so as to satisfy WP:GNG.  See, e.g., this, this, this, this, and this. Cbl62 (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * keep looks like he passes WP:GNG to me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cbl62. Even just a quick Google search reveals that he meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC by virtue of his time as a starting quarterback at both Kentucky and Rhode Island. Ejgreen77 (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete college football player with no more than routine coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The article states, "at graduation [he] had passed for more yardage than any player in Kentucky high school history." Further, WP:GNG doesn't have a concept of "routine" being a restriction, nor should it, so routine coverage is evidence of notability.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Feature articles like those shown are WP:NOTROUTINE and are far beyond the scope of box scores.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep subject has received sufficient coverage to pass GNG. Lepricavark (talk) 20:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable as a high school athlete, and notable as a college athlete, too.  Unscintillating (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.