Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Jack for President


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 21:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Billy Jack for President

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article speculates about a movie that may or may not be made in the future. It puts the expected release date of the movie as 2008, a date that now is in the past. I can find no evidence that the movie has in fact been made. With the end of the Bush Administration, it is increasingly unlikely that the film will be released. Malatinszky (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NFF - no evidence that it is in production. JohnCD (talk) 20:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It rates a mention in the article about Tom Laughlin, who peaked in 1971 with Billy Jack, but never has recaptured that success. When the article was written a year ago, it said that the film would affect the 2008 election.  Try again in '12.  Mandsford (talk) 21:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL, among others. Upcoming films that have articles involve some sort of notability criteria above and beyond the notability of its actors/directors/producers/writers. This isn't even close to that. §FreeRangeFrog 21:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The project has apparently been re-named Billy Jack and Jean.  Given the name change and likely re-purposing of the project in the wake of the 2008 elections, its sketchy production history, plus Laughlin's history of unfinished projects and health problems, the project would have to be very far along before its release could be said to be almost certain to take place.  Baileypalblue (talk) 21:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NFF. Pastor Theo (talk) 00:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Billy Jack. It was already mentioned there and I adjusted the text to say it wasn't released. - Mgm|(talk) 09:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per JohnCD. - Damian Doyle (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Afterboth (talk) 12:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete/merge/redirect to Billy Jack. Oddly enough.... there is enough to support the rumour and discussions of a "possible" film in the main article... but not enough for a seperate article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.