Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Pegram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Billy Pegram

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a writer, not making any properly referenced notability claim per WP:AUTHOR. The fact that his work exists is not an "inherent" inclusion freebie in the absence of enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG, but there are no footnotes here at all. This was once deprodded on the grounds that WorldCat statistics show library holdings of his work, but that still isn't a notability freebie without GNG-worthy sourcing -- and the closest thing to a potential notability claim, a couple of specific colleges using his work as textbooks, has been tagged citation needed since 2009 without ever having a citation added, and still isn't "inherently" notable without the sourcing to properly support it regardless. Bearcat (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Only hits are the books by the fellow himself, zero sources found outside of those. Pretty ladies on the cover, nothing notable. 15:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 19:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.