Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Sánchez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  18:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Billy Sánchez

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't satisfy WP:BIO. The two government positions he held do not confer notability, nor does the scandal. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Puerto Rico.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 11:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: The one commenter so far, Cray04, has been checkuser-blocked. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - The subject, Billy Sánchez, does not appear to meet the notability criteria outlined in WP:GNG due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The references provided do not establish the depth of coverage necessary for notability. The incident of alleged domestic abuse, while potentially notable, does not in itself confer notability on the biography subject per WP:BLP1E, unless it resulted in significant coverage about him beyond the incident. The article may fail WP:POLITICIAN as the role of Sergeant-at-Arms, without additional significant coverage, may not be enough to establish notability...
 * Cray04 (talk) 11:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: name is too common to find anything about this person, what's used in the article now is primary sourcing and one article. Oaktree b (talk) 17:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete:Could not find independent, in-depth sources. At best a very marginally notable individual. As such, given that the main coverage is negative, I think it best to delete per WP:BLPREMOVE and WP:NPF. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 17:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.