Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimadirect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Bimadirect

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails notability guidelines. All the reference provided only list mention of the subject without any actual Significant coverage. Article is work of two SPA accounts, most likely a PR company job. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 12:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  14:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Insurance broker & website, like so many. The article even classes it as an "early stage business"; no evidence of notability. (The article was even featuring their call centre number, which I have removed; Yellow Pages for that.) AllyD (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 05:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 17:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete-Seems like a basic advertisement. Wgolf (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.