Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimal Banerjee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:22, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Bimal Banerjee

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable artist. Also, the content is almost irretrievable and it is embarrassingly bad. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've decimated most of the article. It was almost entirely unsourced by unreliable or primary sources, plus the way it was laid out was fairly promotional or at least non-encyclopedically written. It's not even a fourth of what it was, but the current state looks far better in comparison. I am finding some mention of him in some books, but much of it is brief. I do see the Who's Who mention, but I don't know if that's one of the 1% of Who's Who that actually counts towards notability or if it's one of the other 99% that simply list names for a fee. I'm currently looking into that.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Not Notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:02, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep, quite a few mention in google books. Not bad coverage for an artist whose most productive period probably preceded the www. --Soman (talk) 07:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:05, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG, refs are passing mentions--Nixie9 (talk) 19:33, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.