Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimonthly

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. I'm not going to action the move suggestions since the present content of the article would be pretty weird-looking under that title by itself. Anyone else can move it if they want to, of course. -Splash talk 00:07, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Bimonthly
This is a dicionary definition. A previous entry, very similar to this one, was delted after being transwikied to wiktionary. This isn't a speedy though because afaict there has never been a deletion discussion about it, the transwiki happened after it was marked with the move to wiktionary tag. Thryduulf 09:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Bureaucracy-vote. It's a very obvious dicdef. / Peter Isotalo 11:55, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe redirect to periodical? - SimonP 14:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the discussion of why magazines are published bimonthly is encyclopedic. Kappa 16:25, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe so, but this article isn't that discussion and it should be at Magazine publishing schedules or somewhere like that, unless you want articles for dailys, weeklies, monthlies, three-monthlies, six-monthlies, once-in-a-blue-moonlies, etc. Thryduulf 17:30, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Kappa, you're steadily working your way down to today's breakfast. / Peter Isotalo 00:03, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with that idiom, could you clarify what you mean? Kappa 00:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Move per Thryduulf. Certainly encyclopedic, but only in context with other schedules. - Mgm|(talk) 18:34, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but move per Thryduulf and Mgm. Information is happiest when it is most completely in context! -- BD2412 talk 20:26, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Move - per the other movers (for want of a better word). --Celestianpower hab 22:08, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Magazine, where the publication schedules are already mentioned and there's plenty of room for expansion. (BTW, periodical is a redirect to magazine) That article could use a good clean-up project. &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 23:12, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.