Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binary priority list


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  13:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Binary priority list

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Little indication of notability beyond a couple of research papers. Orphaned for a decade. Pepper Beast   (talk)  16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Not eligible for Soft Deletion as previously PROD'd. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   Pepper Beast    (talk)  16:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Additionally, the topic of using X method of sorting to manage backlog in industry Y would likely be a case of WP:CROSSCAT. PaulT2022 (talk) 17:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: No indication of passing GNG. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.