Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bingo reply cards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Kimchi.sg | talk 19:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Bingo reply cards
Unreferenced, does not assert notability. Gets 3 unique Google hits (the other three are duplicates). Snoutwood (talk) 04:21, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oooh. Based on the evidence presented by Qwernol, I'm withdrawing my nomination. I figure the AfD may as well finish running, though. Snoutwood (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment the article described is a real thing. I used to get "Biotechnology Laboratory" which was free and filled with ads that were numbered; you circle the number of the ad you want information on and send the card back. I didn't know they were called Bingo cards, although that makes sense since they are usually a table of numbers to be circled. Not sure if its notable enough. Thatcher131 04:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into magazines perhaps?. Ive never heard of them but its a not uncommon for mags to distribute that sort of info. Mystache 04:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep it looks like a notable term (though its often "Bingo card"). Google without the quotation marks and you get a slew of relevant hits, for example, and  from the first results page. Clearly a notable and relevant industry term. Gw e rnol 04:37, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gwernol. --Ter e nce Ong 04:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gwernol. --Arnzy (Talk) 09:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep but needs some context. Why do they call them "Bingo reply cards"?--Isotope23 16:01, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.