Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binibining Pilipinas 2016 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to Keep, Any Merges should be discussed on the talkpage (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:41, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Binibining Pilipinas 2016
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article almost completely based on related sources. Adds little or nothing to the already existing information in parent article Binibining Pilipinas. The Banner talk 10:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per previous discussion and this seems much notable. ApprenticeFan  work 10:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 12:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG. Source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , , , , . North America1000 01:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I love to see how you always completely ignore the nomination reasons. The Banner talk 13:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete – Per nom Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:PERNOM. North America1000 13:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Aha, you have found a new shortcut to show off... The Banner talk 13:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Nice ad hominem replies, rather than addressing the sources I presented. North America1000 13:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Year-specific articles for national-level pageants are well-accepted by the community.  See, for example, the many, many such articles for Miss America and Miss USA.  And the subject pageant is notable, as it is a national-level feeder for (I believe) two of the four major international pageants.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.