Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binod khadka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied A7, twice:  first by Materialscientist (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content)), then recreated and deleted again by TParis (A7: Article about an eligible subject, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). Housekeeping closure. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Binod khadka

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is asserted in the article (saving it from an A7), but I can find no sources at all.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  12:40, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete not finding sources. I sentence claiming popularity isn't even a micro stub of an article. RadioFan (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is not even an article. Vincelord (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.