Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioBlu 27


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Closed as G12 ( X! ·  talk )  · @724  · 16:22, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

BioBlu 27

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

This article is essentially an advertisement for this manufacturer's cobalt alloy product. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. If the reliable sources cited as references consider the alloy worth writing about, then it is notable. If there are style issues, they can be fixed without deleting the article. – Eastmain (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't know that the sources can be called reliable. The first source is a white paper on melting technology published by the BioBlu's manufacturer, Carpenter Technology Corporation.  The second sources is inaccessible without a password, but given the url (http://cartech.ides.com), one can assume that this source is also controlled by Carpenter Technology.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The reliable sources were listed under "Citations" rather than "References". I have now fixed that. The publications Jewelers' Circular Keystone (JCK), National Jeweler and Bridal Guide are clearly reliable sources. – Eastmain (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee //  have a cup  //  flagged revs now!  // 05:17, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Very weak delete. Mostly because GScholar  and Gbooks  come back empty.  The alloy is mentioned in the Scott Kay, Inc. article however, and certainly makes an assertation of notability, genuine (at face value) claims to be some sort of unique new and patented alloy, even stripping away the obvious COI there.  The nature of this article is gross spammy, ought to be fixed, but there could well be material for a Wikipedia article, we just need a few 3rd party refs supporting that this alloy has the postulated properties and the postulated usage. Power.corrupts (talk) 21:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete spam. average industrial chemical. nn.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete It's mostly a copyright violation. Some of the last part may not be, but the entire first half is copied from a fact sheet. I blanked most of it, marked it copy-vio and will ask it be deleted. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 22:53, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.