Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioCode


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

BioCode

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vague substub. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 21:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject's lack of wider notability does not mean that it is not important in its host science, i.e. Biology. It concerns the naming of "all kinds of organisms, whether eukaryotic or prokaryotic, fossil or non-fossil, and of fossil traces of organism, that are established (i.e., validly published or made available) and shall govern the choice when names compete among themselves or with earlier names. They shall also, and without limitation of date, provide for the establishment of co-ordinate names within rank groups, for the protection of names, as well as for their correct form." (Source) A world co-ordinated project towards having a unifying nomenclature in a major science is mighty important. The article, however, does a severe injustice to its subject: It's thrown together with less care than the contents of a garbage bin. And, since the BioCode project itself is still in draft form, perhaps the best way forward is merciful euthanasia. -The Gnome (talk) 22:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.