Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioDiscovery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

BioDiscovery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From the PROD nomination: "Fails WP:NCORP, no significant coverage." Was deprodded with the rationale that people edited the page since it was prodded, which is rather silly if you ask me. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:29, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment I think I need to recuse myself for COI reasons, but I will note that the article was substantially revised since the prod, including new sources, so the subsequent deprodding by Explicit seemed reasonable. -- 19:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I was the one who enriched the references set, but that was in an unsuccessful attempt to find sufficient material to support notability. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 17:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.