Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioMOBIUS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Insufficient substantial coverage to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca  talk 00:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

BioMOBIUS

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has been tagged for notability for nearly a year, but no sources have been added. As you can see from the find sources above, it has received essentially no news coverage, and the hits in the web do not lead to an inference of any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Bongo  matic  20:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:37, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no references at all to this in PubMed.   DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * CommentWith all due respect, DGG, medical researchers probably leave this to the department ITs, no?
 * I appreciate that many subjects get many more hits, but 9,550 seems like rather a lot of hits to be called 'essentially no news coverage', without more qualification than 'essentially' already is. Anarchangel (talk) 16:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.