Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioPerformance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. Sandstein 05:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

BioPerformance

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Scam that was shut down. End of story, really. Guy (Help!) 09:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Seems to have had a news article written about it here by the Herald Tribune. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Panser Born (talk • contribs) 11:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Strong Keep They are not defunct,for they are still advertising on Google--as a sponsored link. (& a number of similar scams are piggy-backing on that) The injunction was apparently temporary, as it says in the WP article.   In addition to the herald-Tribune, the NYTimes also had an article, & I have added both, along with a link to the Better Business Bureau, (& there's probably more--I checked only the first few pages of ghits.)  It's a notable scam, with 40,700 ghits for a search of (+Bioperformance +fuel)  DGG 15:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources provided by DGG. -- Whpq 16:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.