Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioPuppy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

BioPuppy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Software package that has attracted close to no independent writing. Article looks to be written by someone associated with the package. Website is now defunct. Fails all of the notability guidelines. Peripitus (Talk) 10:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  16:18, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, defunct specialized Linux distribution that never attracted a userbase or any independent coverage. Never even got picked up by distrowatch. The stated purpose of bundling a bunch of bioinformatics software into an intentionally lightweight distribution is a little dubious to begin with. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:29, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete very little to no coverage for the product. Don't see a true reason to keep this. Chosenone Pie (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - linux distribution of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references. The EMBnet ref may be RS, but at 1 paragraph is brief coverage, and on its own not sufficient to establish notability. A search did not turn up additional RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.