Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioScale Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

BioScale Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Corporate spam, reads like a press release. Probable conflict of interest. wp:g11 was declined (though I would have deleted on that basis, honestly). -- Y not? 16:20, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete THis artical is nothing but spam and show no proof of notability--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC).
 * Weak Keep. I believe it satisfies WP:ORG. Might be a WP:COI and the article needs to be edited according to WP:NPOV. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 16:51, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: The above voter is now blocked indefinitely. —Unforgettableid (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per accurate nom's analysis. Blatant spam by a well-known paid editor and meatpuppet (the same who voted "weak keep" above). Cavarrone  07:14, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.