Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bio Raptor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Zoids:_Genesis.  MBisanz  talk 02:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Bio Raptor

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 23:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge see my comment on Articles for deletion/Bio Ptera - Mgm|(talk) 11:01, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Mgm. Edward321 (talk) 14:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 22:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and I see no attempt at all to do it--this is not the place. ditto form the following articles. If there's a reason against merging, it has not been given, so to bring apparently mergable articles here is an abuse of process.. and I am still waiting for the nominator to explain the final sentence he uses in his nominations. To make repeated nominations in idiosyncratic language and refuse to explain what is meant to repeated questions is not helpful. It's worse than IDONTLIKETHEM, its BECAUSE I SAID SO AND YOU DONT HAVE TO UNDERSTAND. DGG (talk) 03:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Ok calm down DDG. "Abuse of process" please. This is patently unnotable crufty trivia and should be deleted. Eusebeus (talk) 23:34, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.