Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biochain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-07 11:27Z 

Biochain


Original Research Alex Bakharev 04:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Actually it's research published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a conference. But there are thousands of such papers published every year, so it needs to show why it is especially notable. &mdash;Dgiest c 04:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm with Dgies on this one. Notability is not asserted.  Pig manTalk to me 06:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete the article itself implies they coined the term.  DGG 23:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Premature to make an article for this without multiple independent sources. —David Eppstein 07:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This just seems to be an abstract/precis of a paper at a conference. We can't have articles on every paper presented at every conference!  Nothing establishes notability here NBeale 23:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.