Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  21:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Biocool

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. I am unable to find reliable, secondary sources about this; in fact, I can't find any sources about the lab, other than its website. All other sources I found are unrelated. JudgeRM  (talk to me)  19:44, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, may have been created by a lab member, username is close to one of the staff listed here - . Coolabahapple (talk) 13:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete by now, the article is plain advertising The Banner talk 19:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing ORG. I found passing mentions of it (by its full name), but no coverage, significant or otherwise, directly addressing the subject. I removed the promotional material (I don't know why); it no longer satisfies G11. Rebb  ing  10:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: The underlying page BioCOOL was speedy deleted per A7, but I suggest this discussion should run the full week and have a non-speedy close so G4 would apply to a recreation. Rebb  ing  22:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.