Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biodanza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, insufficient reliable sources, particularly for a medical article. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:00, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Biodanza

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I have declined to speedily delete this article because it has a sizeable page history and has been here for a while. The article may be too spammy, reads vaguely, and may be non-notable. The article describes a system of 're-education of life functions', which may be a way of describing an alternative health care technique. Richard Cavell (talk) 03:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this might establish notablity, although it's only a proposal. And here's the bloke who invented it, which could be used for sources. I found this via an EL already within the article. But yeah, de-spam, make neutral and find an English-language version of vivencia, which is probably Spanish. Totnesmartin (talk) 10:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as spammy nonsense.--Boffob (talk) 06:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Lack of notability and verifiability notwithsatanding, this article makes NO SENSE. The weasel word tags are not even appropriate - these are nonsense phrases! Delete until reliable third party sources showing it's notability (inventor would just show existance). One alternative health site mentioning it is not enough - i could make up my own magic super dance non-therapy and pay someone to put it on their quack siteYobmod (talk) 09:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Sean Whitton / 14:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Outright spam for nonnotable woo-wooism. DreamGuy (talk) 14:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.