Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioentrepreneurship in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Bioentrepreneurship in India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely fails to assert notability. Could not find enough references to pass WP:GNG for bioentrepreneurship, to say nothing of bioentrepreneurship in India. Trusilver 03:41, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 00:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Bioentrepreneurship in India is no more an incomplete page, it has got enough references. Thank you for posing this challenge, dear Trusilver .  DUCK IS is one true person, that's a smart decision to let the article remain here on Wikipedia. Thanks. [[User:Aks23121990| Aks23121990  ( talk ) 11:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Whatever may you Wikipedia guys wish, but Indian students (there's a large number of them) do need this page. It's relevant and has enough related references. Thank you for nothing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aks23121990 (talk • contribs) 08:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep (from a drive-by editor). Since this two-day-old article does not apparently meet WP:CSD and is (I hope) still under construction, I think we should wait to delete. That's not to say, though, that deletion may not be on the horizon; of the five bare URLs listed as sources, two are self-published, two seem irrelevant to the article and only one actually discusses the article's subject. Of the two irrelevant sources, one states that bioentrepreneurship is more popular in the U.S. than in India; however, there is no WP entry for bioentrepreneurship. This makes me wonder if this article violates WP:WEIGHT; it might work better as part of an article on bioentrepreurship in general. All the best,  Miniapolis  ( talk ) 17:18, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete More Essay-like than an encyclopedic entry. There is scope to write an article on Bioentrepreneurship, but not much scope exists for an exclusive article for India. In fact, even Biotechnology industry in India does not have an article yet. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 15:47, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete – This article does not meet the notability requirements as bioentrepreneurship in general is a very under-covered subject; bioentrepreneurship in India is even more obscure. There are also problems with the style of this article as it reads very much like a school essay and the references are not provided in accordance with WP:CITE. BarkingNigel (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.