Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biolet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Triolet per WP:ATD. ✗ plicit  12:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Biolet

 * – ( View AfD View log )

In trying to find sources I was inundated with a kind of composting toilet, so I'm hoping some other folks can help try to assess the notability here. From what is in the page as is, I don't think its notable. A kind of poem used by one author apparently sparingly a century ago is perhaps not fully encyclopedic. I think redirecting to Filinto de Almeida might work, but I wasn't sure enough to do it boldly. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 09:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  10:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Possible Redirect to Triolet where the form is mentioned with sufficient detail, i.e. very little. It doesn't need a full article. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.