Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biological horror


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 20:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Biological horror

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable term. No reputable sources that verify whether this is notable. See WP:NOT a dictionary. --Hdt83 Chat 22:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, apparently exists mainly to link to a web site. Realkyhick 22:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the phrase crops up reasonably often in discussion of the works of David Cronenberg. See Google and Google News Archive. But this article is not about that, and clearly pushing a website as the sole source. Gordonofcartoon 23:13, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no reliable sources confirming this use of the word. --Targeman 23:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bigdaddy1981 00:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the horror aspects are covered under body horror and the sci-fi aspects (and most of the examples are more sci-fi than horror) are covered under biopunk. (Emperor 22:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC))
 * Delete per above. Interesting, and I like it, but not yet notable. Bearian 16:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.