Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biological significance of databases

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was article was deleted at 15:03, 20 Jun 2005 by Petaholmes (12 june copyvio). Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:47, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Biological significance of databases
This page is an orphan, has been untouched for more than a month, and was copied verbatim from here. Perhaps it can be significantly rewritten, but I cannot tell if that is a good option. --Prog 20:51, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Not an encyclopedia article. Delete. I have marked the article as a copyvio. - Mike Rosoft 03:09, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Databases are biologically significant? --Xcali 05:36, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if rewritten. JamesBurns 05:38, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * delete; duplicates biological database. Recent genomics and proteomics initiatives have seen the number of biological data balloon, databases are needed to store those data. Dunc|&#9786; 12:00, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .