Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biomechanics of Diabetic foot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:35, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Biomechanics of Diabetic foot

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Essay / original research. Possibly a small amount could be merged into diabetic foot. &mdash; RHaworth 12:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd agree with above; some could be merged, but otherwise delete. Quærens talk / contributions 13:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Needs to be fixed with inline references. Maybe move to Pathophysiology of diabetic feet? making this a subpage of the topic at hand. One does not get "progressive attacks" of DM. -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like a journal survey article, or maybe a graduate-level term paper. I'm sure there is a place somewhere for this information, but Wikipedia isn't it. --MelanieN (talk) 04:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Highly specialised with lots of citations. Needs more wikification.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 15:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Because of copyright violations, see e.g. . -- Crowsnest (talk) 11:08, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Crowsnest. Appears to be a slightly reworded version of the source provided, but the majority of the text is the same as far as I can tell (for example, words like "above" referencing previous sections of the paper have been removed, adverbs have been moved around). -- Kinu t /c  11:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.