Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biomed 101


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Biomed 101

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The page was flagged as unreliable and lacking reliable sources 2 years ago, since that time it hasn't improved and there isn't a clear name or structure to research to improve this as far as I can tell. The chemistds (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment It exists and was manufactured by Searle  and there is a clinical trial . That's as far as I got. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - According to cancer.gov.clinical trials, the trials are closed and the results are not posted.  According to the glossary at nih.gov there doesn't seem to be much more to say about Biomed 101 except what's on this page already. Check the National Cancer Institute dictonary here  Parabolooidal (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia has criteria for including topics and this article fails to meet any criteria that I know.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  13:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Bluerasberry and me (above). Parabolooidal (talk) 13:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.