Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bionic Asura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:31, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Bionic Asura

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Only one independent reference is provided and it's reliability is highly questionable (it's not in my opinion but I may be judging too harshly). A Google News search & Google News Archive search provide no hits. A regular Google search provides many links but they all seem to be self published, unreliable, or only a small mention of the group (not "significant coverage") from what I sifted through. Ol Yeller Talktome 19:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - that source was the only one I could find for the chart position. Since it doesn't seem so reliable to me either, maybe the best action here is deleting, unles someone is able to save the article with better sources. Victão Lopes  I hear you... 20:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak delete There are claims where which might just scrape by the letter of WP:BAND, but as noted above actually sourcing these, not to mention the rest of the article, appears to be a problem. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  03:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.