Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bionic Commando 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Keep. Phgao 04:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Bionic Commando 2

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

per wikipedia not a crystal ball Phgao 14:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC) I admit a mistake, I apologise. But when I tagged it was like this, but I still should have checked. Speedy Keep. Closed. Phgao 04:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * CRYSTAL BALL?! IT HAS AN OFFICIAL SITE! JAF1970 18:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep The games is official announced in almost all gaming sites. --SkyWalker 17:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't remove templates. Phgao 17:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I did not remove the templates. --SkyWalker 10:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as announced game in production. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 18:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - it's a major announcement from Capcom, it has an official site. How much more do you NEED?! SHEESH. JAF1970 18:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. It very clearly exists. Rebochan 18:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Its pretty obvious this game exists. It has its own official website for petes sake! DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  19:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Though I do suggest the name be changed as the game does not appear to be called Bionic Commando 2. DBZROCKS   Its over 9000!!!  19:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine - because Bionic Commando 2 redirects to Bionic Commando (remake). JAF1970 20:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge is there no other article this could possibly go into? Keep it fine, but is this really very encyclopedic? Carter | Talk to me 20:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No. This is not a platformer like the original. Merge? Why not merge Ninja Gaiden II and Ninja Gaiden 2 while you're at it? (laugh) Furthermore, this is being done by a completely new developer (GRIN). JAF1970 21:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Why are we even having this discussion?


 * The game has just been announced. It has an official site, to boot.
 * This is not a platformer at all. It is already vastly different than the NES game, just from screenshots alone. Let's not ignore that a notable first person shooter developer is working on it. Honestly, does THIS seem remotely like a platformer? Bad Title Example.png
 * You're going to have to create this page again if you delete it.
 * Phgao's entire reason for this was "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". Hello? It's a real game.

This is a waste of time, seriously. Onanistic, to be frank. From Phgao's reason for speedy deletion - he thought the game didn't exist - remove the speedy deletion tag. Sheesh. JAF1970 21:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. per above. This is the type of Afd that makes deletionists look bad. Be responsible for what you nominate next time ok? (Google search, talk first to the creator or the involved Wikiproject, and have at least an idea on what you are nominating first)-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.