Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioperformance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 11:41, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Bioperformance
This is an article about an unsourced rumor that doesn't appear to have any basis in reality. Even if it does, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. —Cleared as filed. 02:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "Seems to be, according to some sources" this isn't how you write for an encyclopedia Ruby 02:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as uncyclopedic per nom.Blnguyen 05:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wondering if it could qualify as a Speedy G1.--  み使い  Mitsukai 13:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Phanatic 16:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as not WP:V.--Isotope23 17:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Terminate with extreme prejudice nn, spam, scam, sockpuppetry, I could go on and on... Thatcher131 19:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Avi 18:48, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.