Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioregional decolonization


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 16:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Bioregional decolonization

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about a non notable idea which has no or little coverage in the media, fails WP:GNG Finnegas (talk) 19:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely unsourced, no rationale to keep. Jamesx12345 (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - The article seems like a good faith effort by a user interested in Cascadian bioregionalism. There are reliable sources discussing this topic, but the specific term "bioregional decolonization" seems to be a new term coming out of the Cascadia movement. An article titled "Decolonization and bioregionalism" might be more appropriate, although "bioregional decolonization" does not seem like an egregiously weird way to combine these words. This material could also live at a section within the Bioregionalism article. groupuscule (talk) 03:59, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge to Bioregionalism as suggested by Groupuscule. Bearian (talk) 19:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, unresolvably unreferenced. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 19:30, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.