Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Bioss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I looked back at my earlier days in Wikipedia and found this article I accepted back when I was an AfC reviewer years ago, and realized, after an attempt to look for significant coverage years later, that the subject fails WP:GNG by a wide margin; nearly all but one of the secondary sources in the article don't cover the subject beyond a trivial mention, and I couldn't find much more significant coverage in a search attempt either. letcreate123 (talk) 03:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Quite a bit of the article looks promotional as well. Highway 89 (talk) 03:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Another run-of-the-mill non notable management consultancy company with no significant coverage found - fails WP:NCORP. CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 04:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree.  scope_creep Talk  10:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Only passing references not showing notability. Fails WP:GNG Taewangkorea (talk) 02:15, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.